Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces PJB, a new benchmark for person-job retrieval designed to diagnose reasoning failures in retrieval models. PJB uses real-world recruitment data with complete job descriptions and resumes, defining relevance through job-competency judgment and providing diagnostic labels for domain-family and reasoning-type. Experiments using dense retrieval on PJB reveal significant performance heterogeneity across industry domains, highlighting the limitations of relying on aggregate scores for optimization.
Stop chasing leaderboard gains on generic benchmarks: PJB reveals that domain-specific weaknesses in person-job retrieval far outweigh the benefits of general model upgrades, and that query understanding modules can actually hurt performance.
As retrieval models converge on generic benchmarks, the pressing question is no longer"who scores higher"but rather"where do systems fail, and why?"Person-job matching is a domain that urgently demands such diagnostic capability -- it requires systems not only to verify explicit constraints but also to perform skill-transfer inference and job-competency reasoning, yet existing benchmarks provide no systematic diagnostic support for this task. We introduce PJB (Person-Job Benchmark), a reasoning-aware retrieval evaluation dataset that uses complete job descriptions as queries and complete resumes as documents, defines relevance through job-competency judgment, is grounded in real-world recruitment data spanning six industry domains and nearly 200,000 resumes, and upgrades evaluation from"who scores higher"to"where do systems differ, and why"through domain-family and reasoning-type diagnostic labels. Diagnostic experiments using dense retrieval reveal that performance heterogeneity across industry domains far exceeds the gains from module upgrades for the same model, indicating that aggregate scores alone can severely mislead optimization decisions. At the module level, reranking yields stable improvements while query understanding not only fails to help but actually degrades overall performance when combined with reranking -- the two modules face fundamentally different improvement bottlenecks. The value of PJB lies not in yet another leaderboard of average scores, but in providing recruitment retrieval systems with a capability map that pinpoints where to invest.
