Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces "bounded calibration with contestability," a front-end pattern for LLM-enabled robots allocating assistance in social settings to address pluralistic values and LLM behavioral variability. The proposed pattern constrains prioritization to admissible modes, maintains legibility of the active mode, and provides an outcome-specific contest pathway. This approach aims to mitigate issues of silent defaults and burdensome user configuration, while also addressing potential risks like automation bias.
User-facing guardrails for LLM-enabled robots can balance flexibility and safety by offering constrained choices and clear recourse, rather than open-ended value settings.
LLM-enabled robots prioritizing scarce assistance in social settings face pluralistic values and LLM behavioral variability: reasonable people can disagree about who is helped first, while LLM-mediated interaction policies vary across prompts, contexts, and groups in ways that are difficult to anticipate or verify at contact point. Yet user-facing guardrails for real-time, multi-user assistance allocation remain under-specified. We propose bounded calibration with contestability, a procedural front-end pattern that (i) constrains prioritization to a governance-approved menu of admissible modes, (ii) keeps the active mode legible in interaction-relevant terms at the point of deferral, and (iii) provides an outcome-specific contest pathway without renegotiating the global rule. Treating pluralism and LLM uncertainty as standing conditions, the pattern avoids both silent defaults that hide implicit value skews and wide-open user-configurable"value settings"that shift burden under time pressure. We illustrate the pattern with a public-concourse robot vignette and outline an evaluation agenda centered on legibility, procedural legitimacy, and actionability, including risks of automation bias and uneven usability of contest channels.
