Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the generalization ability of Speech Emotion Recognition (SER) models to synthesized speech, questioning their use as reliable evaluation metrics for emotional expressiveness in speech synthesis. Through systematic evaluation across various datasets, SER models, and speech synthesis methods, the authors find a significant performance drop on synthesized speech compared to human speech. They attribute this failure to representation mismatches caused by speech token prediction in synthesis and the tendency of generative SLMs to rely on textual semantics rather than paralinguistic cues.
SER models, often assumed to generalize well to synthesized speech, actually fail miserably, revealing their reliance on spurious correlations rather than genuine emotional understanding.
Emotion is a core paralinguistic feature in voice interaction. It is widely believed that emotion understanding models learn fundamental representations that transfer to synthesized speech, making emotion understanding results a plausible reward or evaluation metric for assessing emotional expressiveness in speech synthesis. In this work, we critically examine this assumption by systematically evaluating Speech Emotion Recognition (SER) on synthesized speech across datasets, discriminative and generative SER models, and diverse synthesis models. We find that current SER models can not generalize to synthesized speech, largely because speech token prediction during synthesis induces a representation mismatch between synthesized and human speech. Moreover, generative Speech Language Models (SLMs) tend to infer emotion from textual semantics while ignoring paralinguistic cues. Overall, our findings suggest that existing SER models often exploit non-robust shortcuts rather than capturing fundamental features, and paralinguistic understanding in SLMs remains challenging.
