Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the "decentralisation paradox" in digital identity systems, where user-centric designs aiming for decentralization often reintroduce centralized elements. It argues that these architectures redistribute rather than eliminate centralization by framing digital identity as a "wicked problem" with technical, legal, social, and ethical dimensions. The research emphasizes the importance of understanding these interdependencies for designing robust and truly decentralized digital identity architectures.
User-centric digital identity systems, despite their decentralized aspirations, often just shift centralization around rather than eliminating it altogether.
Digital identity is shifting from service- and network-centric approaches toward user-centric ones that promise users increased control over their data. Despite their decentralised design, such approaches often reintroduce centralised components in different forms. This research explores this tension, i.e., the decentralisation paradox, and argues that user-centric architectures tend to redistribute rather than eliminate centralisation. Based on Critical Systems Thinking (CST), digital identity is framed as a"wicked problem"that spans across the technical, legal, social and ethical dimensions. The paper argues that understanding all these interdependencies is essential for designing reliable architectures and ensuring the next generation of digital identity goes beyond superficial decentralisation.
