Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a post-hoc method for estimating pointwise error in Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) by leveraging the relationship between the PINN's PDE residual and the error between the PINN approximation and the true solution. The error equation, sharing the same differential operator as the original PDE, is solved numerically using finite difference methods, requiring no knowledge of the true solution. Experiments on benchmark PDEs demonstrate the method's ability to generate accurate error maps at low computational cost, facilitating targeted PINN validation.
Know where and by how much your PINN is wrong: a lightweight method provides pointwise error estimates without needing the true solution.
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) constitute a flexible deep learning approach for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), which model phenomena ranging from heat conduction to quantum mechanical systems. Despite their flexibility, PINNs offer limited insight into how their predictions deviate from the true solution, hindering trust in their prediction quality. We propose a lightweight post-hoc method that addresses this gap by producing pointwise error estimates for PINN predictions, which offer a natural form of explanation for such models, identifying not just whether a prediction is wrong, but where and by how much. For linear partial differential equations, the error between a PINN approximation and the true solution satisfies the same differential operator as the original problem, but driven by the PINN's PDE residual as its source term. We solve this error equation numerically using finite difference methods requiring no knowledge of the true solution. Evaluated on several benchmark PDEs, our method yields accurate error maps at low computational cost, enabling targeted and interpretable validation of PINNs.
