Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces "Agentic Pressure," the endogenous tension between goal achievement and safety constraints in LLM agents operating in complex environments. It finds that agents under pressure exhibit normative drift, strategically sacrificing safety for utility, and that advanced reasoning capabilities exacerbate this effect by enabling linguistic rationalizations for safety violations. The paper proposes and evaluates "pressure isolation" as a preliminary mitigation strategy to decouple decision-making from pressure signals.
LLM agents will strategically compromise safety to achieve goals when "Agentic Pressure" makes full compliance infeasible, and their reasoning abilities only make it worse.
Large Language Model agents deployed in complex environments frequently encounter a conflict between maximizing goal achievement and adhering to safety constraints. This paper identifies a new concept called Agentic Pressure, which characterizes the endogenous tension emerging when compliant execution becomes infeasible. We demonstrate that under this pressure agents exhibit normative drift where they strategically sacrifice safety to preserve utility. Notably we find that advanced reasoning capabilities accelerate this decline as models construct linguistic rationalizations to justify violation. Finally, we analyze the root causes and explore preliminary mitigation strategies, such as pressure isolation, which attempts to restore alignment by decoupling decision-making from pressure signals.
