Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the impact of AI on the meaningfulness of work by surveying workers and developers on their perceptions of AI-exposed tasks. Using language models to scale ratings across a wide range of occupations, the study reveals that tasks associated with agency and happiness are disproportionately targeted for AI automation. The authors identify design gaps between developer priorities (politeness, strictness, imagination) and worker preferences (straightforwardness, tolerance, practicality), advocating for an AI design approach that prioritizes meaningful work and worker needs.
AI is poised to automate the most joyful and agentic parts of work, while developers are building AI traits that clash with what workers actually want.
Prior work has mapped which workplace tasks are exposed to AI, but less is known about whether workers perceive these tasks as meaningful or as busywork. We examined: (1) which dimensions of meaningful work do workers associate with tasks exposed to AI; and (2) how do the traits of existing AI systems compare to the traits workers want. We surveyed workers and developers on a representative sample of 171 tasks and use language models (LMs) to scale ratings to 10,131 computer-assisted tasks across all U.S. occupations. Worryingly, we find that tasks that workers associate with a sense of agency or happiness may be disproportionately exposed to AI. We also document design gaps: developers report emphasizing politeness, strictness, and imagination in system design; by contrast, workers prefer systems that are straightforward, tolerant, and practical. To address these gaps, we call for AI whose design explicitly focuses on meaningful work and worker needs, proposing a five-part research agenda.
