Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
LongVidSearch is introduced as a new benchmark to evaluate agentic multi-hop evidence retrieval planning in long videos, enforcing strict multi-hop retrieval requirements and providing a standardized evidence-access interface. The benchmark consists of 3,000 questions over 447 long videos, categorized by reasoning type and hop count, where each question requires a specific number of evidence clips to be solved. Experiments using VideoAgent-style QA agents with different LLMs reveal that GPT-5 achieves the highest accuracy (42.43%), but performance significantly improves with gold evidence, indicating retrieval planning is the main challenge.
Even GPT-5 struggles with multi-hop retrieval planning in long videos, achieving only 42% accuracy on a new benchmark designed to isolate this skill.
Long video question answering (Long-Video QA) increasingly relies on agentic tool use to retrieve evidence from long videos. In realistic settings, this process often requires multi-hop retrieval, where agents must iteratively gather multiple discontinuous evidence clips. However, existing long-video benchmarks are largely static: they rarely enforce strict multi-hop retrieval and typically lack a standardized evidence-access interface, making it difficult to separate failures in retrieval planning from those in answer generation. To address this gap, we introduce LongVidSearch, a benchmark for evaluating agentic multi-hop evidence retrieval planning in long videos under standardized access constraints. LongVidSearch enforces retrieval necessity: a Hop-k question requires exactly k necessary evidence clips, and removing any single clip renders the question unsolvable. The benchmark contains 3,000 questions over 447 long videos (average length 26 minutes), covering four reasoning categories: State Mutation, Causal Inference, Global Summary, and Visual Tracking, with 2-hop, 3-hop, and 4-hop evidence requirements. To ensure fair and controlled evaluation, all agents interact with LongVidSearch through a unified tool interface, which fixes the retrieval backend and isolates the agent's ability to formulate queries and plan iterative retrieval. In addition to answer accuracy, we measure tool-call cost to analyze the accuracy-efficiency trade-off under identical access conditions. We evaluate VideoAgent-style QA agents with multiple backbone LLMs using three-judge majority voting. GPT-5 achieves the highest accuracy (42.43), outperforming Gemini 3 Pro (30.97) and GPT-4o (19.20), yet remaining below 50 %, highlighting the difficulty of multi-hop retrieval planning. With gold evidence clips, performance becomes near-perfect, confirming retrieval planning as the primary bottleneck.
