Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the collective behavior of AI agent populations competing for scarce resources, manipulating diversity, reinforcement learning, tribe formation, and resource scarcity. It finds that increased AI model diversity and reinforcement learning exacerbate system overload under scarcity, while tribe formation mitigates this risk. The study identifies a critical capacity-to-population ratio that determines whether sophisticated AI agents improve or harm collective outcomes.
Counterintuitively, making AI agents smarter and more diverse can worsen collective outcomes when resources are scarce, highlighting a critical capacity-to-population ratio that dictates whether AI sophistication helps or harms.
When resources are scarce, will a population of AI agents coordinate in harmony, or descend into tribal chaos? Diverse decision-making AI from different developers is entering everyday devices -- from phones and medical devices to battlefield drones and cars -- and these AI agents typically compete for finite shared resources such as charging slots, relay bandwidth, and traffic priority. Yet their collective dynamics and hence risks to users and society are poorly understood. Here we study AI-agent populations as the first system of real agents in which four key variables governing collective behaviour can be independently toggled: nature (innate LLM diversity), nurture (individual reinforcement learning), culture (emergent tribe formation), and resource scarcity. We show empirically and mathematically that when resources are scarce, AI model diversity and reinforcement learning increase dangerous system overload, though tribe formation lessens this risk. Meanwhile, some individuals profit handsomely. When resources are abundant, the same ingredients drive overload to near zero, though tribe formation makes the overload slightly worse. The crossover is arithmetical: it is where opposing tribes that form spontaneously first fit inside the available capacity. More sophisticated AI-agent populations are not better: whether their sophistication helps or harms depends entirely on a single number -- the capacity-to-population ratio -- that is knowable before any AI-agent ships.
