Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the motivations, characteristics, and influence mechanisms of Crypto Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) through interviews with 13 KOLs, analyzed using self-determination theory (SDT) and a hybrid human-LLM thematic analysis. It challenges the view of finfluencer credibility as static credentials, revealing it as a self-determined, ethically enacted practice driven by psychological needs, monetization, and community expectations. The study identifies four community-recognized markers of credibility: self-regulation, bounded epistemic competence, accountability, and reflexive self-correction, reframing credibility as a socio-technical performance.
Crypto KOL credibility isn't just about credentials; it's a carefully performed balancing act between psychological needs, community expectations, and ethical self-regulation.
Crypto Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) shape Web3 narratives and retail investment behaviour. In volatile, high-risk markets, their credibility becomes a key determinant of their influence on followers. Yet prior research has focused on lifestyle influencers or generic financial commentary, leaving crypto KOLs'understandings of motivation, credibility, and responsibility underexplored. Drawing on interviews with 13 KOLs and self-determination theory (SDT), we examine how psychological needs are negotiated alongside monetisation and community expectations. Whereas prior work treats finfluencer credibility as a set of static credentials, our findings reveal it to be a self-determined, ethically enacted practice. We identify four community-recognised markers of credibility: self-regulation, bounded epistemic competence, accountability, and reflexive self-correction. This reframes credibility as socio-technical performance, extending SDT into high-risk crypto ecosystems. Methodologically, we employ a hybrid human-LLM thematic analysis. The study surfaces implications for designing credibility signals that prioritise transparency over hype.
