Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates how artificial agents can promote cooperation in energy load management within hybrid human-agent populations facing a social dilemma due to demand-dependent pricing. They introduce artificial agents that use globally observable signals to encourage coordination and analyze the evolutionary and reinforcement learning dynamics in mixed populations of adopters and non-adopters. Results show that artificial agents can shift learning dynamics towards coordination and that unilateral adoption is feasible, although non-adopters may disproportionately benefit in certain scenarios.
Even partial adoption of AI agents that use global signals to coordinate energy consumption can improve aggregate outcomes in social dilemmas, but free-riding by non-adopters can create strategic adoption challenges.
In hybrid populations where humans delegate strategic decision-making to autonomous agents, understanding when and how cooperative behaviors can emerge remains a key challenge. We study this problem in the context of energy load management: consumer agents schedule their appliance use under demand-dependent pricing. This structure can create a social dilemma where everybody would benefit from coordination, but in equilibrium agents often choose to incur the congestion costs that cooperative turn-taking would avoid. To address the problem of coordination, we introduce artificial agents that use globally observable signals to increase coordination. Using evolutionary dynamics, and reinforcement learning experiments, we show that artificial agents can shift the learning dynamics to favour coordination outcomes. An often neglected problem is partial adoption: what happens when the technology of artificial agents is in the early adoption stages? We analyze mixed populations of adopters and non-adopters, demonstrating that unilateral entry is feasible: adopters are not structurally penalized, and partial adoption can still improve aggregate outcomes. However, in some parameter regimes, non-adopters may benefit disproportionately from the cooperation induced by adopters. This asymmetry, while not precluding beneficial entry, warrants consideration in deployment, and highlights strategic issues around the adoption of AI technology in multiagent settings.
