Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper uses an AI-guided evolutionary search (AlphaEvolve) to find a value distribution that worsens the lower bound on the approximation ratio between the first-best gains from trade (GFT) and the GFT achieved by the Random-Offerer (RO) mechanism in bilateral trade. The search identifies a new worst-case instance, improving the lower bound from approximately 2.02 to 2.0749. This result demonstrates a larger efficiency gap than previously known for the RO mechanism.
The Random-Offerer mechanism, a staple in bilateral trade, can be even *more* inefficient than we thought – AI-guided search just found a distribution where it captures 2.0749x less gains from trade than the optimal mechanism.
The celebrated Myerson--Satterthwaite theorem shows that in bilateral trade, no mechanism can be simultaneously fully efficient, Bayesian incentive compatible (BIC), and budget balanced (BB). This naturally raises the question of how closely the gains from trade (GFT) achievable by a BIC and BB mechanism can approximate the first-best (fully efficient) benchmark. The optimal BIC and BB mechanism is typically complex and highly distribution-dependent, making it difficult to characterize directly. Consequently, much of the literature analyzes simpler mechanisms such as the Random-Offerer (RO) mechanism and establishes constant-factor guarantees relative to the first-best GFT. An important open question concerns the worst-case performance of the RO mechanism relative to first-best (FB) efficiency. While it was originally hypothesized that the approximation ratio $\frac{\text{GFT}_{\text{FB}}}{\text{GFT}_{\text{RO}}}$ is bounded by $2$, recent work provided counterexamples to this conjecture: Cai et al. proved that the ratio can be strictly larger than $2$, and Babaioff et al. exhibited an explicit example with ratio approximately $2.02$. In this work, we employ AlphaEvolve, an AI-guided evolutionary search framework, to explore the space of value distributions. We identify a new worst-case instance that yields an improved lower bound of $\frac{\text{GFT}_{\text{FB}}}{\text{GFT}_{\text{RO}}} \ge \textbf{2.0749}$. This establishes a new lower bound on the worst-case performance of the Random-Offerer mechanism, demonstrating a wider efficiency gap than previously known.
