Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces PolarBear, a framework for comparing optimization algorithms across problem instances with unknown computational budgets by formulating it as Pareto optimization over time. PolarBear uses rankings instead of objective values, eliminating the need for normalization or known optima, and aggregates coherently across instance distributions. The method employs Bayesian inference over a temporal Plackett-Luce ranking model to identify the anytime Pareto set through adaptive sampling, enabling early elimination of dominated algorithms.
Stop hand-waving about "anytime performance": PolarBear adaptively samples algorithms and uses Bayesian ranking to give you the Pareto-optimal set, ready for deployment under any time budget.
Selecting an optimization algorithm requires comparing candidates across problem instances, but the computational budget for deployment is often unknown at benchmarking time. Current methods either collapse anytime performance into a scalar, require manual interpretation of plots, or produce conclusions that change when algorithms are added or removed. Moreover, methods based on raw objective values require normalization, which needs bounds or optima that are often unavailable and breaks coherent aggregation across instances. We propose a framework that formulates anytime algorithm comparison as Pareto optimization over time: an algorithm is non-dominated if no competitor beats it at every timepoint. By using rankings rather than objective values, our approach requires no bounds, no normalization, and aggregates coherently across arbitrary instance distributions without requiring known optima. We introduce PolarBear (Pareto-optimal anytime algorithms via Bayesian racing), a procedure that identifies the anytime Pareto set through adaptive sampling with calibrated uncertainty. Bayesian inference over a temporal Plackett-Luce ranking model provides posterior beliefs about pairwise dominance, enabling early elimination of confidently dominated algorithms. The output Pareto set together with the posterior supports downstream algorithm selection under arbitrary time preferences and risk profiles without additional experiments.
