Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the Digital Markets Act (DMA) from a technical perspective to derive architectural strategies for value-based platform design. Through qualitative coding and thematic analysis of the DMA, the authors identify eight high-level design strategies aligned with goals like fair practice and user choice. They further map 15 specific tactics used to achieve DMA compliance to these strategies, offering insights for designing services within large platform ecosystems.
The DMA isn't just legal jargon; it's a blueprint for a new generation of platform architectures prioritizing fairness and user choice.
The digital markets act (DMA) regulates very large digital platforms like Meta's Facebook or Apple's iOS with the goal to promote fairness, contestability (of market power) and user choice. From a system design or broader technical perspective, the implications of the DMA have not been studied so far. Using systematic methods from qualitative coding and thematic analysis, we investigate the DMA from a technical perspective and derive eight high-level design strategies that serve as fundamental approaches towards value-based architectural goals like'fair practice', or'user choice'(as envisioned by the DMA). We investigate how compliance with the DMA has been achieved and derive 15 tactics that we map to our strategies. While the DMA obligations challenge existing platform designs, they also create new opportunities for designing services within these huge ecosystems. We, thus, discuss our strategies in light of both. We see this work as a first step towards filling this pressing gap in the architecture of platform ecosystems, i.e., how to incorporate abstract human values in architecture design.
