Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a framework for analyzing collaboration between humans and AIs, focusing on the interplay between alignment, process structure, and outcome quality. It proposes two complementary lenses: a task lens that models collaboration as trajectory evolution in a task space, and an intent lens that examines how individual intents are expressed within shared contexts. The framework is used to re-examine collaboration structure across Human-Human, AI-AI, and Human-AI settings, revealing that similar alignment can lead to different collaboration trajectories and outcomes.
Alignment doesn't guarantee smooth collaboration: this framework reveals how similar alignment can lead to wildly different collaboration trajectories and outcomes in human-AI teams.
In real-world collaboration, alignment, process structure, and outcome quality do not exhibit a simple linear or one-to-one correspondence: similar alignment may accompany either rapid convergence or extensive multi-branch exploration, and lead to different results. Existing accounts often isolate these dimensions or focus on specific participant types, limiting structural accounts of collaboration. We reconceptualize collaboration through two complementary lenses. The task lens models collaboration as trajectory evolution in a structured task space, revealing patterns such as advancement, branching, and backtracking. The intent lens examines how individual intents are expressed within shared contexts and enter situated decisions. Together, these lenses clarify the structural relationships among alignment, decision-making, and trajectory structure. Rather than reducing collaboration to outcome quality or treating alignment as the sole objective, we propose a unified dynamic view of the relationships among alignment, process, and outcome, and use it to re-examine collaboration structure across Human-Human, AI-AI, and Human-AI settings.
