Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates how vision-language models (VLMs) generalize hypernym relationships from visual input, even when explicit hypernym information is removed during training. The authors freeze a pretrained language model and image encoder, training only the intermediate mappings, and then systematically remove hypernym evidence. They find that the language model can recover and generalize hypernym knowledge, especially when visual similarity within counterfactual categories is high, suggesting that cross-modal generalization relies on both visual coherence and linguistic knowledge.
Even when deprived of explicit hypernym examples during training, vision-language models can still generalize taxonomic relationships from images, revealing the surprising power of linguistic priors in cross-modal learning.
What is the interplay between semantic representations learned by language models (LM) from surface form alone to those learned from more grounded evidence? We study this question for a scenario where part of the input comes from a different modality -- in our case, in a vision-language model (VLM), where a pretrained LM is aligned with a pretrained image encoder. As a case study, we focus on the task of predicting hypernyms of objects represented in images. We do so in a VLM setup where the image encoder and LM are kept frozen, and only the intermediate mappings are learned. We progressively deprive the VLM of explicit evidence for hypernyms, and test whether knowledge of hypernyms is recoverable from the LM. We find that the LMs we study can recover this knowledge and generalize even in the most extreme version of this experiment (when the model receives no evidence of a hypernym during training). Additional experiments suggest that this cross-modal taxonomic generalization persists under counterfactual image-label mappings only when the counterfactual data have high visual similarity within each category. Taken together, these findings suggest that cross-modal generalization in LMs arises as a result of both coherence in the extralinguistic input and knowledge derived from language cues.
