Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper investigates the impact of two scissors-correction schemes (scheme-L and scheme-N) on first-principles calculations of second-harmonic generation (SHG) in ultraviolet nonlinear-optical (UV-NLO) crystals. A unified static-limit formulation is derived to avoid spurious divergences and enable robust comparisons between the schemes. Benchmark calculations on borate and phosphate UV-NLO crystals reveal that both schemes preserve the spectral line shape but rescale the overall SHG response, with scheme-N yielding systematically larger magnitudes than scheme-L, although scheme-L sometimes aligns better with experimental data.
Scissors-correction scheme choice in first-principles calculations of second-harmonic generation can shift predicted magnitudes by 15-25%, but surprisingly, the scheme yielding larger magnitudes doesn't always align best with experimental benchmarks.
We assess two widely used scissors-correction implementations for first-principles calculations of second-harmonic generation in ultraviolet nonlinear-optical (UV-NLO) crystals, namely scheme-L [Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ \textbf{63}, 1719 (1989)] and scheme-N [Phys.\ Rev.\ B \textbf{72}, 045223 (2005)]. To enable controlled and numerically robust comparisons, we derive a unified static-limit formulation that avoids spurious divergences and is applicable to both schemes, extending earlier static-limit treatments that were effectively restricted to scheme-L. Benchmark calculations for representative borate and phosphate UV-NLO crystals show that both schemes largely preserve the spectral line shape while mainly rescaling the overall response. Scheme-N yields systematically 15\%--25\% larger magnitudes than scheme-L, although for several tensor components scheme-L agrees better with available experimental benchmarks. We further show that Kleinman symmetry is satisfied in the static limit at the level of the formal theory, whereas apparent violations in practical calculations arise mainly from the sum-rule-based approximation used to evaluate generalized derivatives.
