Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper formalizes the concept of cognitive warfare, distinguishing it from information operations by focusing on attacker-defender interactions within the Observe-Orient-Decide-Act (OODA) loop. It introduces a framework for analyzing cognitive warfare campaigns, defining measurable attributes of cognitive superiority. A notional case study demonstrates the framework's application in assessing cognitive attacks and defenses.
A unified definition and OODA-based framework finally bring rigor to the messy domain of cognitive warfare, enabling quantifiable analysis of attacks and defenses.
Cognitive warfare has emerged as a central feature of modern conflict, yet it remains inconsistently defined and difficult to evaluate. Existing approaches often treat cognitive operations as a subset of information operations, limiting the ability to assess cognitive attacker-defender interactions or determine when advantage has been achieved. This article proposes a unified definition of cognitive warfare, introduces an interaction framework grounded in the OODA loop, and identifies measurable attributes associated with cognitive superiority. To illustrate the use of the framework, a notional case study demonstrates how these concepts can be applied to assess cognitive attacks and defenses in a contested environment. Thus, the framework provides joint force leaders and analysts with a practical foundation for understanding, comparing, and evaluating cognitive warfare campaigns.
