Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper identifies "Contextual Inertia" in LLMs, where models struggle to update reasoning in multi-turn interactions, rigidly adhering to initial (potentially incorrect) reasoning traces even when provided with new information. To mitigate this, they introduce Reinforcement Learning with Single-Turn Anchors (RLSTA), which uses the model's single-turn performance as a stable anchor to provide reward signals for multi-turn interactions. Experiments demonstrate that RLSTA significantly outperforms standard fine-tuning and abstention-based methods, exhibiting strong cross-domain generalization.
LLMs get stuck in their ways: even explicit corrections can't break their rigid adherence to initial (incorrect) reasoning paths in multi-turn interactions, but a novel RL approach can fix it.
While LLMs demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities when provided with full information in a single turn, they exhibit substantial vulnerability in multi-turn interactions. Specifically, when information is revealed incrementally or requires updates, models frequently fail to integrate new constraints, leading to a collapse in performance compared to their single-turn baselines. We term the root cause as \emph{Contextual Inertia}: a phenomenon where models rigidly adhere to previous reasoning traces. Even when users explicitly provide corrections or new data in later turns, the model ignores them, preferring to maintain consistency with its previous (incorrect) reasoning path. To address this, we introduce \textbf{R}einforcement \textbf{L}earning with \textbf{S}ingle-\textbf{T}urn \textbf{A}nchors (\textbf{RLSTA}), a generalizable training approach designed to stabilize multi-turn interaction across diverse scenarios and domains. RLSTA leverages the model's superior single-turn capabilities as stable internal anchors to provide reward signals. By aligning multi-turn responses with these anchors, RLSTA empowers models to break contextual inertia and self-calibrate their reasoning based on the latest information. Experiments show that RLSTA significantly outperforms standard fine-tuning and abstention-based methods. Notably, our method exhibits strong cross-domain generalization (e.g., math to code) and proves effective even without external verifiers, highlighting its potential for general-domain applications.
