Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
MOOSEnger is an AI agent designed to automate the creation and debugging of input files for the MOOSE multiphysics simulation environment. It uses retrieval-augmented generation over MOOSE documentation and examples, combined with MOOSE-aware parsing and validation tools, to translate natural language instructions into runnable input files. The agent incorporates a precheck pipeline to fix formatting errors and invalid object types, and validates inputs by running them within the MOOSE runtime, achieving a 93% execution pass rate on a benchmark compared to an 8% rate for a standard LLM.
MOOSEnger achieves a 93% success rate in generating runnable multiphysics simulation inputs from natural language, while LLMs alone fail 92% of the time.
MOOSEnger is a tool-enabled AI agent tailored to the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE). MOOSE cases are specified in HIT".i"input files; the large object catalog and strict syntax make initial setup and debugging slow. MOOSEnger offers a conversational workflow that turns natural-language intent into runnable inputs by combining retrieval-augmented generation over curated docs/examples with deterministic, MOOSE-aware parsing, validation, and execution tools. A core-plus-domain architecture separates reusable agent infrastructure (configuration, registries, tool dispatch, retrieval services, persistence, and evaluation) from a MOOSE plugin that adds HIT-based parsing, syntax-preserving ingestion of input files, and domain-specific utilities for input repair and checking. An input precheck pipeline removes hidden formatting artifacts, fixes malformed HIT structure with a bounded grammar-constrained loop, and resolves invalid object types via similarity search over an application syntax registry. Inputs are then validated and optionally smoke-tested with the MOOSE runtime in the loop via an MCP-backed execution backend (with local fallback), translating solver diagnostics into iterative verify-and-correct updates. Built-in evaluation reports RAG metrics (faithfulness, relevancy, context precision/recall) and end-to-end success by actual execution. On a 125-prompt benchmark spanning diffusion, transient heat conduction, solid mechanics, porous flow, and incompressible Navier--Stokes, MOOSEnger achieves a 0.93 execution pass rate versus 0.08 for an LLM-only baseline.
