Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces FINEST, a fine-grained evaluation taxonomy for LLM responses to sensitive topics, categorizing errors in helpfulness and harmlessness across Content, Logic, and Appropriateness. Using a Korean-sensitive question dataset, they demonstrate that an improvement pipeline guided by FINEST significantly enhances model responses in all three categories. Score-based improvement, which involves providing category-specific scores and justifications, proves to be the most effective, reducing the error sentence ratio for Appropriateness by up to 33.09%.
LLMs can be made significantly more helpful and less cautious on sensitive topics by using fine-grained feedback that pinpoints specific errors in content, logic, and appropriateness.
Large Language Models (LLMs) often generate overly cautious and vague responses on sensitive topics, sacrificing helpfulness for safety. Existing evaluation frameworks lack systematic methods to identify and address specific weaknesses in responses to sensitive topics, making it difficult to improve both safety and helpfulness simultaneously. To address this, we introduce FINEST, a FINE-grained response evaluation taxonomy for Sensitive Topics, which breaks down helpfulness and harmlessness into errors across three main categories: Content, Logic, and Appropriateness. Experiments on a Korean-sensitive question dataset demonstrate that our score- and error-based improvement pipeline, guided by FINEST, significantly improves the model responses across all three categories, outperforming refinement without guidance. Notably, score-based improvement -- providing category-specific scores and justifications -- yields the most significant gains, reducing the error sentence ratio for Appropriateness by up to 33.09%. This work lays the foundation for a more explainable and comprehensive evaluation and improvement of LLM responses to sensitive questions.
