Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper identifies a gap in AIED research: AI as an epistemic teammate in embodied, unstructured field learning, where learning is assessed through trajectory. To address this, they introduce Field Atlas, a framework grounded in 4E cognition, active inference, and dual coding theory, shifting the AIED metaphor from instruction to sensemaking. Field Atlas uses volitional photography, voice reflection, Socratic AI prompting, and Epistemic Trajectory Modeling (ETM) to represent learning as a trajectory in physical-epistemic space, demonstrated in a museum scenario.
AI can be more than just an information delivery tool; it can be an epistemic teammate in the field, fostering embodied, dialogic human-AI sensemaking.
For four decades, AIED research has rested on what we term the Sedentary Assumption: the unexamined design commitment to a stationary learner seated before a screen. Mobile learning and museum guides have moved learners into physical space, and context-aware systems have delivered location-triggered content -- yet these efforts predominantly cast AI in the role of information-de-livery tool rather than epistemic partner. We map this gap through a 2 x 2 matrix (AI Role x Learning Environment) and identify an undertheorized intersection: the configuration in which AI serves as an epistemic teammate during unstruc-tured, place-bound field inquiry and learning is assessed through trajectory rather than product. To fill it, we propose Field Atlas, a framework grounded in embod-ied, embedded, enactive, and extended (4E) cognition, active inference, and dual coding theory that shifts AIED's guiding metaphor from instruction to sensemak-ing. The architecture pairs volitional photography with immediate voice reflec-tion, constrains AI to Socratic provocation rather than answer delivery, and ap-plies Epistemic Trajectory Modeling (ETM) to represent field learning as a con-tinuous trajectory through conjoined physical-epistemic space. We demonstrate the framework through a museum scenario and argue that the resulting trajecto-ries -- bound to a specific body, place, and time -- constitute process-based evi-dence structurally resistant to AI fabrication, offering a new assessment paradigm and reorienting AIED toward embodied, dialogic human-AI sensemaking in the wild.
