Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces Fluid Logic, a framework for continuous modal logical reasoning using Neural Stochastic Differential Equations (Neural SDEs) to represent modal operators. This framework, instantiated as Logic-Informed Neural Networks (LINNs), embeds modal logical formulas into the training loss of neural networks, guiding them to produce solutions consistent with logical properties. Key properties include stochastic diffusion preventing quantifier collapse, modal operators as entropic risk measures, and SDE-induced accessibility providing structural correspondence with classical modal axioms, demonstrated across epistemic, temporal, and deontic logic domains.
Forget discrete Kripke structures: this work uses Neural SDEs to lift modal logical reasoning to continuous manifolds, enabling logic-informed neural networks that learn from logical constraints without needing governing equations.
We propose Fluid Logic, a paradigm in which modal logical reasoning, temporal, epistemic, doxastic, deontic, is lifted from discrete Kripke structures to continuous manifolds via Neural Stochastic Differential Equations (Neural SDEs). Each type of modal operator is backed by a dedicated Neural SDE, and nested formulas compose these SDEs in a single differentiable graph. A key instantiation is Logic-Informed Neural Networks (LINNs): analogous to Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), LINNs embed modal logical formulas such as ($\Box$ bounded) and ($\Diamond$ visits\_lobe) directly into the training loss, guiding neural networks to produce solutions that are structurally consistent with prescribed logical properties, without requiring knowledge of the governing equations. The resulting framework, Continuous Modal Logical Neural Networks (CMLNNs), yields several key properties: (i) stochastic diffusion prevents quantifier collapse ($\Box$ and $\Diamond$ differ), unlike deterministic ODEs; (ii) modal operators are entropic risk measures, sound with respect to risk-based semantics with explicit Monte Carlo concentration guarantees; (iii)SDE-induced accessibility provides structural correspondence with classical modal axioms; (iv) parameterizing accessibility through dynamics reduces memory from quadratic in world count to linear in parameters. Three case studies demonstrate that Fluid Logic and LINNs can guide neural networks to produce consistent solutions across diverse domains: epistemic/doxastic logic (multi-robot hallucination detection), temporal logic (recovering the Lorenz attractor geometry from logical constraints alone), and deontic logic (learning safe confinement dynamics from a logical specification).
