Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the 2023-2024 US Senate Judiciary Committee's Oversight of AI hearings, focusing on how participants, primarily from the tech industry, construct narratives around AI's impacts. It examines how these narratives are used to advocate for specific governance approaches while discrediting alternatives. The analysis reveals how industry influence shapes dominant understandings of AI and the role of government in its regulation, highlighting the power dynamics at play.
Industry narratives are strategically deployed in AI oversight hearings to shape governance debates, potentially marginalizing alternative perspectives.
This paper investigates early legislative deliberations over Artificial Intelligence in the United States through a thematic analysis of the 2023-2024 Oversight of AI hearings held by the Senate Judiciary Committee's subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law. I focus on these hearings as a site where participants draw from, and renegotiate, accustomed ways of thinking about technology and society. First, I examine how participants, who overwhelmingly represent the technology industry, work to create narratives for understanding the past, present, and future impacts of AI. Second, I examine how these narratives are invoked to argue for particular forms of AI governance, while casting alternative approaches as everything from infeasible to anti-American. By tracing industry influence over dominant understandings of the impacts of AI and the proper role of government, I examine the arrangements of power enacted and upheld through these hearings. In all, I ask: what role to shared (mis)understandings of AI play in early attempts at governing this technology?
