Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces "AI Space Physics," a constitutive semantics designed for governing open, self-expanding AI institutions, focusing on the underdefined causal mechanics of boundary crossing. It proposes a minimal state model featuring typed boundary channels, horizon-limited reach semantics, and a membrane-witness discipline, governed by a core law family (P-1 series) to ensure witness completeness and non-bypass mediation. The key result is the reclassification of authority-surface expansion as a primary boundary event with constitutive witness obligations, making expansion transitions governance-relevant even without immediate external effects.
Governance of AI institutions needs to treat internal expansions of authority as first-class boundary events, even when there are no immediate external consequences.
Agentic AI deployments increasingly behave as persistent institutions rather than one-shot inference endpoints: they accumulate state, invoke external tools, coordinate multiple runtimes, and modify their future authority surface over time. Existing governance language typically specifies decision-layer constraints but leaves the causal mechanics of boundary crossing underdefined, particularly for transitions that do not immediately change the external world yet expand what the institution can later do. This paper introduces AI Space Physics as a constitutive semantics for open, self-expanding AI institutions. We define a minimal state model with typed boundary channels, horizon-limited reach semantics, and a membrane-witness discipline. The core law family (P-1, P-1a, P-1b, P-1c) requires witness completeness, non-bypass mediation, atomic adjudication-to-effect transitions, and replayable reconstruction of adjudication class. We explicitly separate second-order effects into structural expansion and policy broadening, and treat expansion transitions as governance-relevant even when immediate external deltas are zero. The novelty claim is precise rather than expansive: this work does not introduce mediation as a concept; it reclassifies authority-surface expansion as a first-class boundary event with constitutive witness obligations. In this semantics, expansion without immediate commit remains adjudication-relevant.
