Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel approach to Argumentative Component Detection (ACD) that leverages instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) and compact instruction-based prompts. ACD is reframed as a language generation task, allowing for direct identification of argumentative components from plain text, bypassing the need for pre-segmented components. Experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate that this method outperforms existing state-of-the-art systems, showcasing the potential of instruction tuning for complex argumentation mining problems.
Instruction-tuned LLMs can directly generate argumentative components from text, outperforming specialized systems in argument mining.
Argumentative component detection (ACD) is a core subtask of Argument(ation) Mining (AM) and one of its most challenging aspects, as it requires jointly delimiting argumentative spans and classifying them into components such as claims and premises. While research on this subtask remains relatively limited compared to other AM tasks, most existing approaches formulate it as a simplified sequence labeling problem, component classification, or a pipeline of component segmentation followed by classification. In this paper, we propose a novel approach based on instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) using compact instruction-based prompts, and reframe ACD as a language generation task, enabling arguments to be identified directly from plain text without relying on pre-segmented components. Experiments on standard benchmarks show that our approach achieves higher performance compared to state-of-the-art systems. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first attempts to fully model ACD as a generative task, highlighting the potential of instruction tuning for complex AM problems.
