Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates interaction approaches for integrating Generative AI (GenAI) into professional design practice, arguing that traditional prompt-based or whole-image manipulation methods can hinder designers' creative workflows. It presents three interaction approaches—DesignPrompt, FusAIn, and DesignTrace—that distribute control across intent, input, and process to improve AI alignment with designers' goals. The study highlights the dynamic negotiation between designers and AI, where AI adopts proactive or reactive roles based on the designer's needs and the creative stage.
Current GenAI tools force designers into verbal reasoning or post-hoc adjustments, but new interaction approaches can distribute control across intent, input, and process to better align AI with creative practice.
Design is a non-linear, reflective process in which practitioners engage with visual, semantic, and other expressive materials to explore, iterate, and refine ideas. As Generative AI (GenAI) becomes integrated into professional design practice, traditional interaction approaches focusing on prompts or whole-image manipulation can misalign AI output with designers' intent, forcing visual thinkers into verbal reasoning or post-hoc adjustments. We present three interaction approaches from DesignPrompt, FusAIn, and DesignTrace that distribute control across intent, input, and process, enabling designers to guide AI alignment at different stages of interaction. We further argue that alignment is a dynamic negotiation, with AI adopting proactive or reactive roles according to designers' instrumental and inspirational needs and the creative stage.
