Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces SpatialText, a diagnostic benchmark designed to isolate and evaluate spatial reasoning abilities in LLMs, disentangling it from linguistic heuristics and visual perception. SpatialText uses a dual-source approach, combining human-annotated descriptions of 3D indoor environments with code-generated scenes to probe spatial deduction and epistemic boundaries. Experiments with state-of-the-art models reveal limitations in egocentric perspective transformation and local reference frame reasoning, suggesting a reliance on linguistic co-occurrence rather than genuine spatial understanding.
LLMs can parrot spatial facts, but SpatialText reveals they fail at the kind of perspective-taking and local reasoning that suggests they lack true spatial understanding.
Genuine spatial reasoning relies on the capacity to construct and manipulate coherent internal spatial representations, often conceptualized as mental models, rather than merely processing surface linguistic associations. While large language models exhibit advanced capabilities across various domains, existing benchmarks fail to isolate this intrinsic spatial cognition from statistical language heuristics. Furthermore, multimodal evaluations frequently conflate genuine spatial reasoning with visual perception. To systematically investigate whether models construct flexible spatial mental models, we introduce SpatialText, a theory-driven diagnostic framework. Rather than functioning simply as a dataset, SpatialText isolates text-based spatial reasoning through a dual-source methodology. It integrates human-annotated descriptions of real 3D indoor environments, which capture natural ambiguities, perspective shifts, and functional relations, with code-generated, logically precise scenes designed to probe formal spatial deduction and epistemic boundaries. Systematic evaluation across state-of-the-art models reveals fundamental representational limitations. Although models demonstrate proficiency in retrieving explicit spatial facts and operating within global, allocentric coordinate systems, they exhibit critical failures in egocentric perspective transformation and local reference frame reasoning. These systematic errors provide strong evidence that current models rely heavily on linguistic co-occurrence heuristics rather than constructing coherent, verifiable internal spatial representations. SpatialText thus serves as a rigorous instrument for diagnosing the cognitive boundaries of artificial spatial intelligence.
