Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper models how workers decide to delegate tasks to AI and verify its outputs, considering outcome-based institutional evaluations that may conflict with workers' personal costs. It defines worker quality based on an institution-centered utility evaluated at the worker's optimal delegation and verification strategy. The analysis reveals that AI adoption can induce phase transitions in worker behavior, amplifying quality disparities based on verification ability, even with improved task success.
AI adoption can paradoxically degrade institutional worker quality by incentivizing over-delegation and reduced oversight, even when AI improves baseline task success.
As AI systems enter institutional workflows, workers must decide whether to delegate task execution to AI and how much effort to invest in verifying AI outputs, while institutions evaluate workers using outcome-based standards that may misalign with workers'private costs. We model delegation and verification as the solution to a rational worker's optimization problem, and define worker quality by evaluating an institution-centered utility (distinct from the worker's objective) at the resulting optimal action. We formally characterize optimal worker workflows and show that AI induces *phase transitions*, where arbitrarily small differences in verification ability lead to sharply different behaviors. As a result, AI can amplify workers with strong verification reliability while degrading institutional worker quality for others who rationally over-delegate and reduce oversight, even when baseline task success improves and no behavioral biases are present. These results identify a structural mechanism by which AI reshapes institutional worker quality and amplifies quality disparities between workers with different verification reliability.
