Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper models the co-evolution of human skill and AI delegation as a dynamical system, where both adapt to minimize expected task error. The analysis reveals that adaptive AI use introduces a stable low-skill equilibrium, leading to persistent reliance and potentially irreversible skill loss. The authors demonstrate that AI assistance can improve short-term performance while causing long-term skill degradation compared to scenarios without AI, highlighting stability as a key factor in this phenomenon.
AI delegation can create a "point of no return" in human skill development, where early reliance leads to a stable state of low skill even if the AI is imperfect.
As AI systems shift from tools to collaborators, a central question is how the skills of humans relying on them change over time. We study this question mathematically by modeling the joint evolution of human skill and AI delegation as a coupled dynamical system. In our model, delegation adapts to relative performance, while skill improves through use and decays under non-use; crucially, both updates arise from optimizing a single performance metric measuring expected task error. Despite this local alignment, adaptive AI use fundamentally alters the global stability structure of human skill acquisition. Beyond the high-skill equilibrium of human-only learning, the system admits a *stable* low-skill equilibrium corresponding to persistent reliance, separated by a sharp basin boundary that makes early decisions effectively irreversible under the induced dynamics. We further show that AI assistance can strictly improve short-run performance while inducing persistent long-run performance loss relative to the no-AI baseline, driven by a negative feedback between delegation and practice. We characterize how AI quality deforms the basin boundary and show that these effects are robust to noise and asymmetric trust updates. Our results identify stability, not incentives or misalignment, as the central mechanism by which AI assistance can undermine long-run human performance and skill.
