Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the impact of model size, dataset size, and input resolution on the efficiency of rooftop PV detection in resource-constrained Earth observation. The authors find an efficiency inversion, where smaller models (YOLO11N) outperform larger models (YOLO11X) in both efficiency and absolute mAP$_{50}$. They also demonstrate that increasing input resolution is the most effective way to improve efficiency, while adding more data provides minimal benefit at low resolution.
In resource-constrained Earth observation, smaller object detection models can outperform larger ones in both efficiency and accuracy, overturning common scaling law assumptions.
Scaling laws assume larger models trained on more data consistently outperform smaller ones -- an assumption that drives model selection in computer vision but remains untested in resource-constrained Earth observation (EO). We conduct a systematic efficiency analysis across three scaling dimensions: model size, dataset size, and input resolution, on rooftop PV detection in Madagascar. Optimizing for model efficiency (mAP$_{50}$ per unit of model size), we find a consistent efficiency inversion: YOLO11N achieves both the highest efficiency ($24\times$ higher than YOLO11X) and the highest absolute mAP$_{50}$ (0.617). Resolution is the dominant resource allocation lever ($+$120% efficiency gain), while additional data yields negligible returns at low resolution. These findings are robust to the deployment objective: small high-resolution configurations are Pareto-dominant across all 44 setups in the joint accuracy-throughput space, leaving no tradeoff to resolve. In data-scarce EO, bigger is not just unnecessary: it can be worse.
