Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces CausalWrap (CW), a model-agnostic wrapper that injects partial causal knowledge (PCK) into pre-trained tabular synthetic data generators to improve causal fidelity. CW learns a differentiable post-hoc correction map applied to samples from the base generator, optimized with causal penalty terms under an augmented-Lagrangian schedule, thereby enforcing trusted edges, forbidden edges, and qualitative/monotonic constraints. Experiments on simulated SCMs, semi-synthetic causal benchmarks, and a real-world ICU cohort demonstrate that CW significantly improves causal fidelity (e.g., ATE error reduction) while maintaining conventional utility.
Make your synthetic tabular data causally aware: CausalWrap injects causal knowledge into any pre-trained generator, boosting treatment effect estimation by up to 63% without sacrificing data quality.
Tabular synthetic data generators are typically trained to match observational distributions, which can yield high conventional utility (e.g., column correlations, predictive accuracy) yet poor preservation of structural relations relevant to causal analysis and out-of-distribution (OOD) reasoning. When the downstream use of synthetic data involves causal reasoning -- estimating treatment effects, evaluating policies, or testing mediation pathways -- merely matching the observational distribution is insufficient: structural fidelity and treatment-mechanism preservation become essential. We propose CausalWrap (CW), a model-agnostic wrapper that injects partial causal knowledge (PCK) -- trusted edges, forbidden edges, and qualitative/monotonic constraints -- into any pretrained base generator (GAN, VAE, or diffusion model), without requiring access to its internals. CW learns a lightweight, differentiable post-hoc correction map applied to samples from the base generator, optimized with causal penalty terms under an augmented-Lagrangian schedule. We provide theoretical results connecting penalty-based optimization to constraint satisfaction and relating approximate factorization to joint distributional control. We validate CW on simulated structural causal models (SCMs) with known ground-truth interventions, semi-synthetic causal benchmarks (IHDP and an ACIC-style suite), and a real-world ICU cohort (MIMIC-IV) with expert-elicited partial graphs. CW improves causal fidelity across diverse base generators -- e.g., reducing average treatment effect (ATE) error by up to 63% on ACIC and lifting ATE agreement from 0.00 to 0.38 on the intensive care unit (ICU) cohort -- while largely retaining conventional utility.