Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the challenge of automated paper reproduction, focusing on recovering tacit knowledge (relational, somatic, and collective) that is not explicitly stated in papers. They propose a graph-based agent framework (\method) that uses relation-aware aggregation, execution-feedback refinement, and graph-level knowledge induction to recover these different types of tacit knowledge. Experiments on an extended ReproduceBench demonstrate that \method{} significantly reduces the performance gap compared to official implementations and outperforms existing baselines.
Automating paper reproduction isn't about finding code, it's about filling in the "missing manual" of tacit knowledge, and this graph-based agent closes the gap by 24.68%.
Automated paper reproduction -- generating executable code from academic papers -- is bottlenecked not by information retrieval but by the tacit knowledge that papers inevitably leave implicit. We formalize this challenge as the progressive recovery of three types of tacit knowledge -- relational, somatic, and collective -- and propose \method, a graph-based agent framework with a dedicated mechanism for each: node-level relation-aware aggregation recovers relational knowledge by analyzing implementation-unit-level reuse and adaptation relationships between the target paper and its citation neighbors; execution-feedback refinement recovers somatic knowledge through iterative debugging driven by runtime signals; and graph-level knowledge induction distills collective knowledge from clusters of papers sharing similar implementations. On an extended ReproduceBench spanning 3 domains, 10 tasks, and 40 recent papers, \method{} achieves an average performance gap of 10.04\% against official implementations, improving over the strongest baseline by 24.68\%. The code will be publicly released upon acceptance; the repository link will be provided in the final version.
Tsinghua AI