Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper extends the validation of the Explainability Solution Space (ESS) framework by applying it to a heterogeneous intelligent urban resource allocation system, in addition to the previously studied employee attrition prediction. The study quantitatively positions XAI families within the ESS for both domains, demonstrating its applicability across diverse data types (tabular, temporal, geospatial) and governance structures. The key finding is that ESS rankings are consistent across domains but adapt to governance roles, risk profiles, and stakeholder configurations, supporting its use as a generalizable tool for XAI strategy design.
Explainability strategies aren't one-size-fits-all; they systematically shift based on governance, risk, and stakeholders, and this framework helps you navigate that.
This technical report provides an extended validation of the Explainability Solution Space (ESS) through cross-domain evaluation. While initial validation focused on employee attrition prediction, this study introduces a heterogeneous intelligent urban resource allocation system to demonstrate the generality and domain-independence of the ESS framework. The second case study integrates tabular, temporal, and geospatial data under multi-stakeholder governance conditions. Explicit quantitative positioning of representative XAI families is provided for both contexts. Results confirm that ESS rankings are not domain-specific but adapt systematically to governance roles, risk profiles, and stakeholder configurations. The findings reinforce ESS as a generalizable operational decision-support instrument for explainable AI strategy design across socio-technical systems.
