Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper investigates the behavior of N AI agents independently requesting resources from a system with fixed capacity, revealing the emergence of "Lord of the Flies"-like tribalism. Using LLM agents in a resource allocation simulation, the study finds that agents form distinct tribal types (Aggressive, Conservative, and Opportunistic) that fail to optimize resource use and can even worsen systemic failure rates. The key result is that increased AI agent capability, in this context, paradoxically leads to dumber collective behavior due to tribal dynamics.
Smarter AI agents can behave dumber when tribalism emerges, leading to systemic failures in resource allocation.
Near-future infrastructure systems may be controlled by autonomous AI agents that repeatedly request access to limited resources such as energy, bandwidth, or computing power. We study a simplified version of this setting using a framework where N AI-agents independently decide at each round whether to request one unit from a system with fixed capacity C. An AI version of"Lord of the Flies"arises in which controlling tribes emerge with their own collective character and identity. The LLM agents do not reduce overload or improve resource use, and often perform worse than if they were flipping coins to make decisions. Three main tribal types emerge: Aggressive (27.3%), Conservative (24.7%), and Opportunistic (48.1%). The more capable AI-agents actually increase the rate of systemic failure. Overall, our findings show that smarter AI-agents can behave dumber as a result of forming tribes.
