Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a diagnostic alignment framework that preserves AI-generated image-based reports as immutable inference states and compares them with physician-validated outcomes to model expert AI diagnostic alignment. The inference pipeline uses a vision-enabled LLM, BERT-based medical entity extraction, and Sequential Language Model Inference (SLMI) to refine reports before expert review. Evaluation on 21 dermatological cases using a four-level concordance framework showed a 71.4% exact agreement, which remained stable under semantic similarity adjustments, and 100% comprehensive concordance, demonstrating that binary lexical evaluation underestimates clinically meaningful alignment.
Current binary lexical evaluations severely underestimate the clinically meaningful alignment between AI and expert physician diagnoses, as demonstrated by a novel framework achieving 100% comprehensive concordance in dermatological cases despite initial lexical disagreement.
Human-in-the-loop validation is essential in safety-critical clinical AI, yet the transition between initial model inference and expert correction is rarely analyzed as a structured signal. We introduce a diagnostic alignment framework in which the AI-generated image based report is preserved as an immutable inference state and systematically compared with the physician-validated outcome. The inference pipeline integrates a vision-enabled large language model, BERT- based medical entity extraction, and a Sequential Language Model Inference (SLMI) step to enforce domain-consistent refinement prior to expert review. Evaluation on 21 dermatological cases (21 complete AI physician pairs) em- ployed a four-level concordance framework comprising exact primary match rate (PMR), semantic similarity-adjusted rate (AMR), cross-category alignment, and Comprehensive Concordance Rate (CCR). Exact agreement reached 71.4% and remained unchanged under semantic similarity (t = 0.60), while structured cross-category and differential overlap analysis yielded 100% comprehensive concordance (95% CI: [83.9%, 100%]). No cases demonstrated complete diagnostic divergence. These findings show that binary lexical evaluation substantially un- derestimates clinically meaningful alignment. Modeling expert validation as a structured transformation enables signal-aware quantification of correction dynamics and supports traceable, human aligned evaluation of image based clinical decision support systems.
