Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces ClinDet-Bench, a new benchmark to evaluate Large Language Models' (LLMs) ability to determine whether available clinical information is sufficient for making a judgment, a crucial skill for safe clinical decision-making. ClinDet-Bench uses clinical scoring systems to create scenarios with varying degrees of information completeness, requiring LLMs to consider all possible hypotheses about missing data to assess determinability. Experiments show that current LLMs struggle with determinability, exhibiting both premature judgments and excessive abstention, even when they possess the underlying clinical knowledge and perform well with complete data.
LLMs that ace medical exams still fumble basic clinical judgment, prematurely deciding cases or abstaining unnecessarily when information is incomplete, revealing a critical gap in their real-world applicability.
Clinical decisions are often required under incomplete information. Clinical experts must identify whether available information is sufficient for judgment, as both premature conclusion and unnecessary abstention can compromise patient safety. To evaluate this capability of large language models (LLMs), we developed ClinDet-Bench, a benchmark based on clinical scoring systems that decomposes incomplete-information scenarios into determinable and undeterminable conditions. Identifying determinability requires considering all hypotheses about missing information, including unlikely ones, and verifying whether the conclusion holds across them. We find that recent LLMs fail to identify determinability under incomplete information, producing both premature judgments and excessive abstention, despite correctly explaining the underlying scoring knowledge and performing well under complete information. These findings suggest that existing benchmarks are insufficient to evaluate the safety of LLMs in clinical settings. ClinDet-Bench provides a framework for evaluating determinability recognition, leading to appropriate abstention, with potential applicability to medicine and other high-stakes domains, and is publicly available.
