Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel framework for persuasive dialogue agents that synthesizes persuasive strategies from social psychology, behavioral economics, and communication theory. The framework aims to overcome the limitations of existing agents that rely on a narrow set of predefined strategies. Experiments on the Persuasion for Good and DailyPersuasion datasets demonstrate that the framework improves persuasion success rates and exhibits strong generalizability, particularly in persuading individuals with low initial intent.
Persuasive dialogue agents can now better sway even the most resistant individuals, thanks to a new framework that borrows tactics from psychology, economics, and communication.
Current approaches to developing persuasive dialogue agents often rely on a limited set of predefined persuasive strategies that fail to capture the complexity of real-world interactions. We applied a cross-disciplinary approach to develop a framework for designing persuasive dialogue agents that draws on proven strategies from social psychology, behavioral economics, and communication theory. We validated our proposed framework through experiments on two distinct datasets: the Persuasion for Good dataset, which represents a specific in-domain scenario, and the DailyPersuasion dataset, which encompasses a wide range of scenarios. The proposed framework achieved strong results for both datasets and demonstrated notable improvement in the persuasion success rate as well as promising generalizability. Notably, the proposed framework also excelled at persuading individuals with initially low intent, which addresses a critical challenge for persuasive dialogue agents.
