Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper argues that the AI alignment problem is fundamentally an economic alignment problem, exacerbated by growth-based economic systems. It proposes mitigating AI risks by adopting post-growth economic principles like satisficing, using the Doughnut model for development guidance, and implementing resource caps to curb systemic rebound effects. The authors advocate for governance and business reforms that treat AI as a commons, prioritizing tool-like AI and suggesting that AGI development necessitates a new economic framework rooted in post-growth scholarship.
Solving AI alignment may require ditching growth-obsessed economics and embracing post-growth principles like satisficing and resource caps.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is advancing exponentially and is likely to have profound impacts on human wellbeing, social equity, and environmental sustainability. Here we argue that the"alignment problem"in AI research is also an economic alignment problem, as developing advanced AI inside a growth-based system is likely to increase social, environmental, and existential risks. We show that post-growth research offers concepts and policies that could substantially reduce AI risks, such as by replacing optimisation with satisficing, using the Doughnut of social and planetary boundaries to guide development, and curbing systemic rebound with resource caps. We propose governance and business reforms that treat AI as a commons and prioritise tool-like autonomy-enhancing systems over agentic AI. Finally, we argue that the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI) may require a new economics, for which post-growth scholarship provides a strong foundation.
