Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This systematic review examines the landscape of automated red teaming methodologies, focusing on their application for enhancing the assurance and security of AI applications. It addresses the limitations of manual red teaming by exploring how AI and automation can improve efficiency and scalability in vulnerability assessments. The review synthesizes existing research to provide a comprehensive overview of automated red teaming tools, benefits, and limitations, while also identifying current trends and research gaps in the field.
Automated red teaming promises to revolutionize AI security by offering efficient, scalable vulnerability assessments that outpace traditional manual methods.
Cybersecurity threats are becoming increasingly sophisticated, making traditional defense mechanisms and manual red teaming approaches insufficient for modern organizations. While red teaming has long been recognized as an effective method to identify vulnerabilities by simulating real-world attacks, its manual execution is resource-intensive, time-consuming, and lacks scalability for frequent assessments. These limitations have driven the evolution toward auto-mated red teaming, which leverages artificial intelligence and automation to deliver efficient and adaptive security evaluations. This systematic review consolidates existing research on automated red teaming, examining its methodologies, tools, benefits, and limitations. The paper also highlights current trends, challenges, and research gaps, offering insights into future directions for improving automated red teaming as a critical component of proactive cybersecurity strategies. By synthesizing findings from diverse studies, this review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how automation enhances red teaming and strengthens organizational resilience against evolving cyber threats.
