Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces a Sequential Counterfactual Framework to address the limitations of standard counterfactual inference methods when applied to longitudinal clinical data, which often violate assumptions of feature independence and simultaneous modifiability. This framework distinguishes between immutable and controllable features and models the temporal propagation of interventions. Applied to a cohort of COVID-19 patients, the framework identifies a cardiorenal cascade (CKD -> AKI -> HF) and demonstrates that naive counterfactual methods often require biologically impossible interventions for patients with chronic conditions.
Naive counterfactual methods in clinical settings can lead to biologically impossible scenarios, but a new sequential framework avoids this by respecting temporal dependencies and revealing clinically actionable insights.
Counterfactual inference enables clinicians to ask "what if" questions about patient outcomes, but standard methods assume feature independence and simultaneous modifiability -- assumptions violated by longitudinal clinical data. We introduce the Sequential Counterfactual Framework, which respects temporal dependencies in electronic health records by distinguishing immutable features (chronic diagnoses) from controllable features (lab values) and modeling how interventions propagate through time. Applied to 2,723 COVID-19 patients (383 Long COVID heart failure cases, 2,340 matched controls), we demonstrate that 38-67% of patients with chronic conditions would require biologically impossible counterfactuals under naive methods. We identify a cardiorenal cascade (CKD -> AKI -> HF) with relative risks of 2.27 and 1.19 at each step, illustrating temporal propagation that sequential -- but not naive -- counterfactuals can capture. Our framework transforms counterfactual explanation from "what if this feature were different?" to "what if we had intervened earlier, and how would that propagate forward?" -- yielding clinically actionable insights grounded in biological plausibility.
