Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces M-GENGAR, a closed-loop Digital Twin (DT) methodology for dependability assurance in medical Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) that integrates patient, device, and healthcare personnel. M-GENGAR uses Stochastic Hybrid Automata modeling, data-driven learning of patient dynamics, and Statistical Model Checking to identify critical failure scenarios violating dependability requirements. The approach automates the synthesis of mitigation strategies, demonstrating that these strategies stabilize patient vital metrics as effectively as human decision-making in 87.5% of evaluated scenarios, while maintaining relevant metrics 20% closer to nominal healthy values.
Digital twins can now proactively identify and mitigate medical device failures, outperforming human decision-making in a significant percentage of scenarios.
Medical Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) integrating Patients, Devices, and healthcare personnel (Physicians) form safety-critical PDP triads whose dependability is challenged by system heterogeneity and uncertainty in human and physiological behavior. While existing clinical decision support systems support clinical practice, there remains a need for proactive, reliability-oriented methodologies capable of identifying and mitigating failure scenarios before patient safety is compromised. This paper presents M-GENGAR, a methodology based on a closed-loop Digital Twin (DT) paradigm for dependability assurance of medical CPSs. The approach combines Stochastic Hybrid Automata modeling, data-driven learning of patient dynamics, and Statistical Model Checking with an offline critical scenario detection phase that integrates model-space exploration and diversity analysis to systematically identify and classify scenarios violating expert-defined dependability requirements. M-GENGAR also supports the automated synthesis of mitigation strategies, enabling runtime feedback and control within the DT loop. We evaluate M-GENGAR on a representative use case study involving a pulmonary ventilator. Results show that, in 87.5% of the evaluated scenarios, strategies synthesized through formal game-theoretic analysis stabilize patient vital metrics at least as effectively as human decision-making, while maintaining relevant metrics 20% closer to nominal healthy values on average.
