Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper addresses the problem of miscalibration in conditional independence tests (CITs), which leads to failure in providing frequentist guarantees for causal discovery and feature selection, especially in small samples or with model misspecification. They introduce Empirically Calibrated Conditional Independence Tests (ECCIT), a method that optimizes an adversary to identify and measure miscalibration in a base CIT. ECCIT then fits a monotone calibration map to adjust the p-values of the base test, correcting for the observed miscalibration.
Conditional independence tests often fail in practice, but ECCIT fixes this by learning to correct for miscalibration, boosting statistical power while maintaining FDR control.
Conditional independence tests (CIT) are widely used for causal discovery and feature selection. Even with false discovery rate (FDR) control procedures, they often fail to provide frequentist guarantees in practice. We highlight two common failure modes: (i) in small samples, asymptotic guarantees for many CITs can be inaccurate and even correctly specified models fail to estimate the noise levels and control the error, and (ii) when sample sizes are large but models are misspecified, unaccounted dependencies skew the test's behavior and fail to return uniform p-values under the null. We propose Empirically Calibrated Conditional Independence Tests (ECCIT), a method that measures and corrects for miscalibration. For a chosen base CIT (e.g., GCM, HRT), ECCIT optimizes an adversary that selects features and response functions to maximize a miscalibration metric. ECCIT then fits a monotone calibration map that adjusts the base-test p-values in proportion to the observed miscalibration. Across empirical benchmarks on synthetic and real data, ECCIT achieves valid FDR with higher power than existing calibration strategies while remaining test agnostic.
