Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces a novel report-supervised learning framework (MS-RSuper) for brain lesion segmentation that leverages both global quantitative and modality-wise qualitative findings from MRI reports. MS-RSuper addresses the limitations of classical report-supervised methods by explicitly parsing hierarchical findings, handling uncertainty, and incorporating anatomical priors to improve segmentation accuracy. Experiments on a large dataset of brain tumor MRI scans demonstrate that MS-RSuper significantly outperforms sparsely-supervised and naive report-supervised baselines.
Radiology reports can be directly translated into effective supervision signals for brain lesion segmentation, even with incomplete or uncertain information, by explicitly parsing findings and using a unified, uncertainty-aware loss formulation.
Report-supervised (RSuper) learning seeks to alleviate the need for dense tumor voxel labels with constraints derived from radiology reports (e.g., volumes, counts, sizes, locations). In MRI studies of brain tumors, however, we often involve multi-parametric scans and substructures. Here, fine-grained modality/parameter-wise reports are usually provided along with global findings and are correlated with different substructures. Moreover, the reports often describe only the largest lesion and provide qualitative or uncertain cues (``mild,''``possible''). Classical RSuper losses (e.g., sum volume consistency) can over-constrain or hallucinate unreported findings under such incompleteness, and are unable to utilize these hierarchical findings or exploit the priors of varied lesion types in a merged dataset. We explicitly parse the global quantitative and modality-wise qualitative findings and introduce a unified, one-sided, uncertainty-aware formulation (MS-RSuper) that: (i) aligns modality-specific qualitative cues (e.g., T1c enhancement, FLAIR edema) with their corresponding substructures using existence and absence losses; (ii) enforces one-sided lower-bounds for partial quantitative cues (e.g., largest lesion size, minimal multiplicity); and (iii) adds extra- vs. intra-axial anatomical priors to respect cohort differences. Certainty tokens scale penalties; missing cues are down-weighted. On 1238 report-labeled BraTS-MET/MEN scans, our MS-RSuper largely outperforms both a sparsely-supervised baseline and a naive RSuper method.
