Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces MAST, a multi-fidelity surrogate modeling technique designed to balance computational cost and predictive accuracy by combining low-fidelity data with sparse high-fidelity observations. MAST models the discrepancy between fidelities and uses distance-based weighting to blend corrected low-fidelity predictions with high-fidelity predictions, effectively trusting high-fidelity data near observed samples and relying on corrected low-fidelity data elsewhere. Experiments on multi-fidelity benchmarks demonstrate that MAST outperforms existing state-of-the-art techniques, especially under tight budget constraints and varying fidelity gaps, while maintaining stable performance.
Multi-fidelity modeling gets a boost with MAST, which leverages spatial trust-weighting to intelligently blend low- and high-fidelity data, achieving robust performance even when data is scarce or fidelity gaps are large.
In engineering design and scientific computing, computational cost and predictive accuracy are intrinsically coupled. High-fidelity simulations provide accurate predictions but at substantial computational costs, while lower-fidelity approximations offer efficiency at the expense of accuracy. Multi-fidelity surrogate modelling addresses this trade-off by combining abundant low-fidelity data with sparse high-fidelity observations. However, existing methods suffer from expensive training cost or rely on global correlation assumptions that often fail in practice to capture how fidelity relationships vary across the input space, leading to poor performance particularly under tight budget constraints. We introduce MAST, a method that blends corrected low-fidelity observations with high-fidelity predictions, trusting high-fidelity near observed samples and relying on corrected low-fidelity elsewhere. MAST achieves this through explicit discrepancy modelling and distance-based weighting with closed-form variance propagation, producing a single heteroscedastic Gaussian process. Across multi-fidelity synthetic benchmarks, MAST shows a marked improvement over the current state-of-the-art techniques. Crucially, MAST maintains robust performance across varying total budget and fidelity gaps, conditions under which competing methods exhibit significant degradation or unstable behaviour.
