Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces NanoKnow, a benchmark dataset derived from Natural Questions and SQuAD, designed to disentangle the sources of knowledge in LLMs by partitioning questions based on the presence of their answers in the pre-training corpus of the nanochat family of models. Using NanoKnow, the authors analyze the impact of pre-training data on closed-book accuracy, the effectiveness of external evidence in mitigating frequency dependence, and the interplay between parametric and external knowledge. Experiments with eight nanochat checkpoints reveal that closed-book accuracy is strongly influenced by answer frequency in pre-training data, external evidence complements parametric knowledge, and non-relevant information is detrimental to accuracy.
NanoKnow reveals that even with external evidence, LLMs are more accurate when answers were seen during pre-training, highlighting the crucial role of parametric knowledge.
How do large language models (LLMs) know what they know? Answering this question has been difficult because pre-training data is often a"black box"-- unknown or inaccessible. The recent release of nanochat -- a family of small LLMs with fully open pre-training data -- addresses this as it provides a transparent view into where a model's parametric knowledge comes from. Towards the goal of understanding how knowledge is encoded by LLMs, we release NanoKnow, a benchmark dataset that partitions questions from Natural Questions and SQuAD into splits based on whether their answers are present in nanochat's pre-training corpus. Using these splits, we can now properly disentangle the sources of knowledge that LLMs rely on when producing an output. To demonstrate NanoKnow's utility, we conduct experiments using eight nanochat checkpoints. Our findings show: (1) closed-book accuracy is strongly influenced by answer frequency in the pre-training data, (2) providing external evidence can mitigate this frequency dependence, (3) even with external evidence, models are more accurate when answers were seen during pre-training, demonstrating that parametric and external knowledge are complementary, and (4) non-relevant information is harmful, with accuracy decreasing based on both the position and the number of non-relevant contexts. We release all NanoKnow artifacts at https://github.com/castorini/NanoKnow.
