Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper investigates the effectiveness of modern text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models (2022-2025) as synthetic data generators for training classifiers. Surprisingly, they find that despite improvements in visual fidelity and prompt adherence, classification accuracy on real-world test data *decreases* when training on synthetic data from newer T2I models. This performance regression is attributed to a collapse towards an aesthetic-centric distribution, reducing diversity and label-image alignment in the generated data.
Stunning visuals from the latest text-to-image models don't guarantee better training data -- in fact, they can make your image classifiers *worse*.
Recent text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models produce visually stunning images and demonstrate excellent prompt following. But do they perform well as synthetic vision data generators? In this work, we revisit the promise of synthetic data as a scalable substitute for real training sets and uncover a surprising performance regression. We generate large-scale synthetic datasets using state-of-the-art T2I models released between 2022 and 2025, train standard classifiers solely on this synthetic data, and evaluate them on real test data. Despite observable advances in visual fidelity and prompt adherence, classification accuracy on real test data consistently declines with newer T2I models as training data generators. Our analysis reveals a hidden trend: These models collapse to a narrow, aesthetic-centric distribution that undermines diversity and label-image alignment. Overall, our findings challenge a growing assumption in vision research, namely that progress in generative realism implies progress in data realism. We thus highlight an urgent need to rethink the capabilities of modern T2I models as reliable training data generators.
