Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the sensitivity of causal discovery methods to the choice of sampling rate and window length when applied to time series data. It demonstrates that both classical and recent causal discovery algorithms are significantly affected by these hyperparameters, potentially leading to incorrect causal inferences. The authors suggest that signal processing techniques can provide insights into understanding and mitigating these sensitivities.
Causal discovery's reliability hinges on often-overlooked sampling choices, as even state-of-the-art methods wobble significantly with varying rates and window lengths.
Causal discovery problems use a set of observations to deduce causality between variables in the real world, typically to answer questions about biological or physical systems. These observations are often recorded at regular time intervals, determined by a user or a machine, depending on the experiment design. There is generally no guarantee that the timing of these recordings matches the timing of the underlying biological or physical events. In this paper, we examine the sensitivity of causal discovery methods to this potential mismatch. We consider empirical and theoretical evidence to understand how causal discovery performance is impacted by changes of sampling rate and window length. We demonstrate that both classical and recent causal discovery methods exhibit sensitivity to these hyperparameters, and we discuss how ideas from signal processing may help us understand these phenomena.
