Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces KGHaluBench, a new benchmark for evaluating hallucinations in LLMs that uses a knowledge graph (KG) to dynamically generate challenging questions. The benchmark addresses limitations of existing static benchmarks by providing broader and deeper coverage of LLM knowledge, while also mitigating popularity bias through statistical difficulty estimation. Experiments on 25 frontier models using novel accuracy and hallucination metrics reveal insights into knowledge factors contributing to hallucinations across different model sizes.
LLM truthfulness is more nuanced than we thought: a new knowledge graph benchmark reveals that hallucination rates vary significantly depending on the breadth and depth of knowledge required.
Large Language Models (LLMs) possess a remarkable capacity to generate persuasive and intelligible language. However, coherence does not equate to truthfulness, as the responses often contain subtle hallucinations. Existing benchmarks are limited by static and narrow questions, leading to limited coverage and misleading evaluations. We present KGHaluBench, a Knowledge Graph-based hallucination benchmark that assesses LLMs across the breadth and depth of their knowledge, providing a fairer and more comprehensive insight into LLM truthfulness. Our framework utilises the KG to dynamically construct challenging, multifaceted questions, whose difficulty is then statistically estimated to address popularity bias. Our automated verification pipeline detects abstentions and verifies the LLM's response at both conceptual and correctness levels to identify different types of hallucinations. We evaluate 25 frontier models, using novel accuracy and hallucination metrics. The results provide a more interpretable insight into the knowledge factors that cause hallucinations across different model sizes. KGHaluBench is publicly available to support future developments in hallucination mitigation.
