Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper presents a case study of designing and implementing a comprehensive career ladder for Research Software Engineers (RSEs) at Princeton University, addressing the lack of structured career pathways in higher education for this rapidly growing role. The authors detail the design principles, competency framework, and HR alignment involved in creating a career ladder spanning Associate to Principal levels, including team-lead and managerial tracks. The implementation resulted in improved hiring efficiency, clearer promotion pathways, and positive staff reception.
Princeton's RSE career ladder offers a blueprint for universities struggling to retain technical talent in research, showing how to define roles, benchmark salaries, and create clear paths for advancement.
Research Software Engineers (RSEs) have become indispensable to computational research and scholarship. The fast rise of RSEs in higher education and the trend of universities to be slow creating or adopting models for new technology roles means a lack of structured career pathways that recognize technical mastery, scholarly impact, and leadership growth. In response to an immense demand for RSEs at Princeton University, and dedicated funding to grow the RSE group at least two-fold, Princeton was forced to strategize how to cohesively define job descriptions to match the rapid hiring of RSE positions but with enough flexibility to recognize the unique nature of each individual position. This case study describes our design and implementation of a comprehensive RSE career ladder spanning Associate through Principal levels, with parallel team-lead and managerial tracks. We outline the guiding principles, competency framework, Human Resources (HR) alignment, and implementation process, including engagement with external consultants and mapping to a standard job leveling framework utilizing market benchmarks. We share early lessons learned and outcomes including improved hiring efficiency, clearer promotion pathways, and positive reception among staff.
